日本消費者連盟
すこやかないのちを未来へ
Sound and Healthy Future for Our Children

Campaign Against Railway Glyphosate Use

As part of our ongoing work to get rid of the herbicide glyphosate (active ingredient in Roundup and several other herbicides) the No! GMO Campaign wrote to all major railway companies in Japan early in 2020. Many people are concerned about the spraying of this cancer-causing chemical to kill weeds along train tracks. And several railway companies have revealed in their environmental reports or sustainability reports that they are trying to reduce the use of herbicides. Unfortunately, none of the railway companies replied to our letter and did not answer our questions. As part of our campaign, we also asked the railway companies, including JR, Odakyu Line, Keio Line, Seibu Line and others to completely stop using glyphosate.

When we wrote to them a second time this spring, only a few companies replied:

JR East Japan: We do not reveal the names of individual herbicides that we use

JR West Japan: We are using glyphosate

JR Kyushu: We are using glyphosate

JR Shikoku: No reply regarding glyphosate

JR Tokai: No reply regarding glyphosate

Kintetsu Railway: We do not use glyphosate

Read the replies on the No! GMO Campaign website (Japanese)

Shimakaze Limited Express

(Photo: Kintetsu Railway “Shimakaze” train)

PANAP: Accountability and Justice for Glyphosate Victims Wanting

Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific (PANAP) issued the following criticism of the 10 Billion US Dollar payout to victims of glyphosate poisoning:

Quote:

Penang, Malaysia—Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific (PANAP) today said that corporate accountability and justice for victims of glyphosate poisoning is still wanting, after agrochemical giant Bayer’s more than $10 Billion settlement of 95,000 suits filed by glyphosate users in the US.

Considered as among the largest settlements ever in US civil litigation, the payout however contains “no admission of liability and wrongdoing” by Bayer’s Monsanto, manufacturer of RoundUp (glyphosate). Glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, is the subject of thousands of lawsuits for its link with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a form of cancer. It is included in PAN International’s list of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) that are targeted for global elimination or phase-out.

The settlement includes $1.25 billion for potential future claims from Roundup customers who may develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A so-called “independent” panel of scientists will be set up to decide whether Roundup causes cancer—however, Bayer will be involved in selecting such a panel. The settlement also allows for Bayer to continue selling RoundUp without safety warnings. Some 30,000 individuals have refused to become part of the settlement.

Read the Press Release at PANAP’s website

Pesticide Use in Japan

We would like to highlight the interesting reports in The Ecologist about pesticide use in Japan. Phil Carter, a freelance environmental journalist, explores how broad-spectrum pesticides used mainly at rice paddy fields are harming insects and the environment:

Quote:

Chemical companies are taking advantage of Japan’s weak laws on pesticide use by selling a wide variety of broad-spectrum pesticides for use in rice farming, including neonicotinoids banned in other countries.

But other pesticide types with similarly devastating effects on aquatic ecosystems continue to be sold and promoted, such as Trebon, a synthetic pyrethroid sold by Mitsui Chemicals, and Prince, containing fipronil, a phenylpyrazole sold by BASF. 

Simultaneously, a worldwide insect extinction event is ongoing in which broad-spectrum insecticides are implicated as a leading cause.

Japanese rice fields are losing aquatic insects such as iconic autumn darter dragonflies that use the flooded fields in the nymph part of their lifecycle. The resulting pollution of rivers and lakes has also led to the collapse of the fishery in Lake Shinji in Shimane Prefecture, which scientists have connected to neonicotinoid use in surrounding rice fields.

The process of removing dangerous pesticides from use is an arduous one, with companies like Bayer fighting bitterly to continue sales of each product both in court and with campaigns to discredit any critical scientific studies. In recent years, this scorched-earth approach has led to environmental groups focusing their energies on neonicotinoids, eventually achieving bans on some products in the European Union. 

Read the reports on The Ecologist website

Japan Resources – 177

Please click here for our latest English newsletter: CUJ Japan Resources 177

We hope you will continue to stay updated with CUJ’s activities and news on our English website, and support our campaigns!

Contents:

From the Editors: Back to the Future?

New Campaign: Organic and Pesticide-free Ingredients for School Lunches

Urgent Request for Countermeasures Against the New Coronavirus

CUJ: Concerns Regarding Genome Editing of Fish

Almost Half a Million Signatures Supporting Our Gene-Editing Petition

We protest against the submission of the draft amendment to the Seed and Seedling Act to the Parliament and call for its withdrawal

We protest against the submission of the draft amendment to the Seed and Seedling Act to the Parliament and call for its withdrawal

14 May 2020

On 3 March, the Government of Japan submitted a draft amendment to the Seed and Seedling Act to the Parliament in a cabinet decision, aiming for passage and enactment during the current parliamentary session. At a time when the country is under a declared state of emergency due to the Covid Pandemic, it can be said that the Government is again working like a firebrand to get it passed.

The focus of the amendment is to extend the ban on unauthorised self-propagation and self-seeding, which was previously limited to certain registered varieties, to all registered varieties. Penalties for non-compliance will also be strengthened. This will increase profits for seed companies, but restrict farmers’ rights and deprive them of food sovereignty. It strengthens the rights of transnational seed companies to develop genome-edited and other genetically engineered crops, threatening food security.

The Seed and Seedling Act is the national law of the UPOV Convention (International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants), which was enacted in 1961. The Convention was born out of the development of new varieties by government research institutes and large companies, as well as the move to protect the varieties developed. It is known as Plant Variety Protection (PVP) or seed patents, and has been part of intellectual property rights (IP).

As Monsanto (now Bayer AG) and other companies developed GM crops and biotechnology became central to seed development, the UPOV Convention was amended in 1991 with the main aim of protecting them, and the Seed and Seedling Act was amended in 1998 in response. The amendment to the Convention at that time prohibited in principle the self-seeding and self-propagation of registered varieties, but as each country could specify prohibited crops at its discretion, the Government initially banned only a small number of crops. The number of banned crops was still 82 in 2016, but this number began to increase the following year, reaching 387 in 2019, and is finally about to be applied to all registered varieties with the current amendments.

The ongoing trend to strengthen IP is closely linked to the national strategy being pursued by the Abe Government. The reality that those who control seeds control food has been realised by multinational companies such as Monsanto. It has been made imperative to control intellectual property in order to control seeds. This has resulted in the development of new varieties using new technologies. Genome editing technology has been placed at the heart of this.

The revision of the Seed and Seedling Act has been timed to coincide with the emergence of a new seed domination technology: genome editing technology. The ban on unauthorised self-propagation and self-seeding is to be extended to all registered varieties in order to strengthen the protection of intellectual property, which has become even more important. Strengthening Plant Variety Protection has in the past strengthened the control of seeds by corporations, including multinationals, and has deprived farmers of their rights, food sovereignty and food safety. This amendment will further amplify this situation. We protest against the submission of the Seed and Seedling Act Amendment Bill to the Parliament and call for its withdrawal.